Healthiest Places to Live in the London
32 upper-tier local authorities in the London, ranked by the Gera Healthy-Place Index — air quality, life expectancy and GP access from real government data.
What are the healthiest places to live in the London?
In the London, Richmond upon Thames is the healthiest place to live on the Gera Healthy-Place Index, scoring 79.1/100 across 32 upper-tier local authorities. It combines clean air (max 10/24 μg/m³ PM2.5/NO2, DEFRA 2024), life expectancy of 84.4 years (ONS) and 100.0% of GP practices rated Good or Outstanding (CQC).
| Region rank | Local authority | GHPI | Max PM2.5 / NO2 | Life expectancy | GP Good/Outstanding |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Richmond upon Thames | 79.1 / 100 | 10 / 24 μg/m³ | 84.4 years | 100.0% |
| 2 | Harrow | 78.3 / 100 | 9 / 20 μg/m³ | 84.7 years | 92.9% |
| 3 | Bromley | 75.3 / 100 | 10 / 21 μg/m³ | 83.3 years | 97.6% |
| 4 | Kensington and Chelsea | 72 / 100 | 12 / 32 μg/m³ | 85.4 years | 96.7% |
| 5 | Barnet | 71.4 / 100 | 11 / 28 μg/m³ | 84.4 years | 95.7% |
| 6 | Merton | 70.7 / 100 | 10 / 22 μg/m³ | 82.8 years | 95.5% |
| 7 | Sutton | 70.5 / 100 | 10 / 21 μg/m³ | 82.6 years | 95.0% |
| 8 | Croydon | 70.3 / 100 | 10 / 24 μg/m³ | 82.2 years | 100.0% |
| 9 | Bexley | 69.3 / 100 | 11 / 24 μg/m³ | 82.1 years | 100.0% |
| 10 | Camden | 68.9 / 100 | 12 / 35 μg/m³ | 85.2 years | 97.0% |
| 11 | Redbridge | 68 / 100 | 12 / 28 μg/m³ | 83.4 years | 97.6% |
| 12 | Brent | 67.3 / 100 | 11 / 29 μg/m³ | 83.4 years | 96.4% |
| 13 | Enfield | 66.4 / 100 | 11 / 31 μg/m³ | 82.8 years | 100.0% |
| 14 | Wandsworth | 66.4 / 100 | 10 / 30 μg/m³ | 82.4 years | 100.0% |
| 15 | Havering | 65.9 / 100 | 11 / 25 μg/m³ | 82.1 years | 97.0% |
| 16 | Kingston upon Thames | 65.9 / 100 | 11 / 30 μg/m³ | 83.5 years | 95.5% |
| 17 | Newham | 65.9 / 100 | 12 / 24 μg/m³ | 81.9 years | 97.7% |
| 18 | Westminster | 64.5 / 100 | 12 / 36 μg/m³ | 86.0 years | 88.6% |
| 19 | Hammersmith and Fulham | 62.5 / 100 | 12 / 32 μg/m³ | 82.3 years | 100.0% |
| 20 | Hackney | 62.3 / 100 | 12 / 31 μg/m³ | 82.0 years | 100.0% |
| 21 | Lambeth | 60.9 / 100 | 11 / 33 μg/m³ | 81.8 years | 100.0% |
| 22 | Hounslow | 60.6 / 100 | 11 / 27 μg/m³ | 82.1 years | 92.5% |
| 23 | Ealing | 60.4 / 100 | 12 / 29 μg/m³ | 82.9 years | 91.3% |
| 24 | Waltham Forest | 59.4 / 100 | 12 / 28 μg/m³ | 82.9 years | 89.5% |
| 25 | Haringey | 58.9 / 100 | 11 / 25 μg/m³ | 82.8 years | 85.3% |
| 26 | Lewisham | 55.8 / 100 | 11 / 26 μg/m³ | 81.5 years | 88.5% |
| 27 | Hillingdon | 54.5 / 100 | 11 / 35 μg/m³ | 82.1 years | 93.0% |
| 28 | Islington | 54.5 / 100 | 12 / 35 μg/m³ | 81.5 years | 96.8% |
| 29 | Southwark | 52.7 / 100 | 11 / 31 μg/m³ | 82.2 years | 86.2% |
| 30 | Tower Hamlets | 51.9 / 100 | 12 / 34 μg/m³ | 82.0 years | 90.3% |
| 31 | Barking and Dagenham | 48.2 / 100 | 11 / 26 μg/m³ | 80.2 years | 85.3% |
| 32 | Greenwich | 47.6 / 100 | 12 / 30 μg/m³ | 81.5 years | 83.3% |
London areas in detail
- Is Richmond upon Thames a healthy place to live? (79.1/100)
- Is Harrow a healthy place to live? (78.3/100)
- Is Bromley a healthy place to live? (75.3/100)
- Is Kensington and Chelsea a healthy place to live? (72/100)
- Is Barnet a healthy place to live? (71.4/100)
- Is Merton a healthy place to live? (70.7/100)
- Is Sutton a healthy place to live? (70.5/100)
- Is Croydon a healthy place to live? (70.3/100)
- Is Bexley a healthy place to live? (69.3/100)
- Is Camden a healthy place to live? (68.9/100)
- Is Redbridge a healthy place to live? (68/100)
- Is Brent a healthy place to live? (67.3/100)
- Is Enfield a healthy place to live? (66.4/100)
- Is Wandsworth a healthy place to live? (66.4/100)
- Is Havering a healthy place to live? (65.9/100)
- Is Kingston upon Thames a healthy place to live? (65.9/100)
- Is Newham a healthy place to live? (65.9/100)
- Is Westminster a healthy place to live? (64.5/100)
- Is Hammersmith and Fulham a healthy place to live? (62.5/100)
- Is Hackney a healthy place to live? (62.3/100)
- Is Lambeth a healthy place to live? (60.9/100)
- Is Hounslow a healthy place to live? (60.6/100)
- Is Ealing a healthy place to live? (60.4/100)
- Is Waltham Forest a healthy place to live? (59.4/100)
- Is Haringey a healthy place to live? (58.9/100)
- Is Lewisham a healthy place to live? (55.8/100)
- Is Hillingdon a healthy place to live? (54.5/100)
- Is Islington a healthy place to live? (54.5/100)
- Is Southwark a healthy place to live? (52.7/100)
- Is Tower Hamlets a healthy place to live? (51.9/100)
- Is Barking and Dagenham a healthy place to live? (48.2/100)
- Is Greenwich a healthy place to live? (47.6/100)
Other regions
- Healthiest places in the East Midlands
- Healthiest places in the East of England
- Healthiest places in the North East
- Healthiest places in the North West
- Healthiest places in the South East
- Healthiest places in the South West
- Healthiest places in the West Midlands
- Healthiest places in the Yorkshire and The Humber
- National ranking →
Healthiest places in the London: FAQs
- Which is the healthiest place to live in the London?
- Richmond upon Thames ranks healthiest in the London on the Gera Healthy-Place Index (79.1/100), ahead of 31 other upper-tier local authorities in the region, on a composite of DEFRA air quality, ONS life expectancy and CQC GP access.
- How many London areas are ranked?
- 32 upper-tier local authorities in the London have full data on all three pillars and are ranked. Nationally, 145 English areas are included; areas missing any pillar are excluded transparently, never estimated.
Healthcare across the London
A GeraClinic UK-registered clinician can see you by secure video from anywhere in the UK — wherever you are in the region, often the same day.
Contains public sector information published by Gera Systems and licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0 (source data). Source: Gera Healthy-Place Index — composite of DEFRA + ONS + CQC open data (Air 2024 calendar year; life expectancy 2017-19; GP ratings 2026-06-01, published 19 June 2026).